Anyone who thinks that a free, unregulated economy can thrive in an unequal global marketplace is a fool.Given that RIM remains profitable, it seems premature to suggest that the government can or should do much of anything to assist it. The company faces mounting criticism over its product lines and its failure to address the competitive threats from Apple Inc. and Google Inc. — business issues that lie beyond the expertise or mandate of government policy-makers. (Geist)
Caterpillar. Yes, you know it. There is an unwritten but very visible tendency to push our economy down to meet the market of corporations not placed in Canada. Canada is open for business to plunder, to dominate. It's easier for government to walk away from responsibilities to respond to its voters. Corporations can lobby directly to the government, are easily satisfied with moving the agenda of WTO global interests forward.While RIM’s current problems can’t be solved by government policy, some of its shortcomings may be a product of Canadian policy. Indeed, RIM is the quintessential Canadian technology company, reflecting the market’s strengths and weaknesses. If the government wants to avoid a Nortel repeat, part of the solution lies in addressing the problems that plague Canadian telecom policy.
Unless you buy an unlocked phone and are a nerdy geek who knows how to circumvent the phone company drain on your pocket, you'll be paying big money to run your business. Another way in which Canadians cannot be competitive is our slavery to the telecoms. More money for Rogers and Bell. And by business writing it off, it's really a subsidy to those companies, just like gas expenses for business.RIM was never shy about trumpeting its perceived competitive advantages. For years, co-founder Mike Lazaridis promoted the data efficiency of RIM’s BlackBerry, while emphasizing that wireless spectrum is a finite resource. From RIM’s perspective, efficient use of data makes its devices more attractive to wireless carriers, which incur lower costs when compared with bandwidth-hogging devices such as the Apple iPhone.
The deliberate crap contract plans by these big three just underline how dishonest the whole business is. Who can cut through that constant blabbergab of nonsense, their use of voicemail, outsourcing of calls for tech support, their poor customer relations. All these are signs of a business model that only works one way. That they don't care because they don't have to compete. That we are stuck with being irrelevant slaves to their product.The emphasis on spectrum scarcity and the value of currying favour with telecom carriers is very much a product of the Canadian marketplace. Bell, Rogers, and Telus dominate our wireless market, resulting in longer consumer contracts than those found elsewhere, among the highest roaming fees in the world and expensive wireless data costs. Moreover, the government has retained foreign investment restrictions in the telecom sector long after most other developed economies dropped them, and it is years behind the United States in conducting spectrum auctions that could yield new competitors.
Demand an end to the CRTC cronyism to the Conservative government ownership of telecommunications.
Realize that if you feel like you're being screwed by the gov and your phone product - you are.